Legal Opinion

Cones v. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1888No. 13,208PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.

Complaint in two paragraphs by George. W. Cones, administrator of the estate of Tilghman A. H. Cones, against the above named railway company, charging-that the latter had wrongfully caused the death of the plaintiff’s intestate by driving one of its engines and trains at an excessive rate of speed oyer a public highway crossing, without giving the signals required by law, thereby causing the engine and train so driven to collide with the buggy in which the intestate, was riding.

At the trial the jury returned a general verdict in favor of the plaintiff, assessing his damages at $2,000. With…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schofield v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. BrannaganIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. GreeneIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. HammockIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Oleson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. SpilkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. StickIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API