Legal Opinion

Holman v. CPT CORP.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1990No. C7-90-76PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Upon her discharge from employment by respondent CPT Corporation, appellant Margaret Holman filed this lawsuit, alleging unjust enrichment and failure to pay wages and commissions in violation of common law and Minn.Stat. § 181.13 (1986). The trial court granted CPT’s motion for summary judgment, and Holman appealed. We reverse and remand for further proceedings on the merits.

FACTS

Holman began working as a sales representative for CPT in 1980. Initially, Holman was paid a salary and partial commission, but in 1981, CPT began paying her on a straight commission basis.

At the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Cederstrand v. Lutheran BrotherhoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. Sauter Ex Rel. Benson v. SauterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ventura v. Titan Sports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. Schibursky v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
  4. Midwest Sports Marketing, Inc. v. Hillerich & Bradsby of Canada, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Mon-Ray, Inc. v. Granite Re, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API