Legal Opinion
Mon-Ray, Inc. v. Granite Re, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 7, 2004No. A03-660PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge.
Appellant is a public corporation that hires general contractors for work on a sound-insulation program that appellant developed and operates. Appellant challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment to respondent subcontractors, arguing that the district court erred by determining that a forfeiture provision in appellant’s contracts with a general contractor did not “bind” or “apply to” the subcontractors or the respondent surety because they are not parties to the contracts and that, therefore, appellant is not entitled to $44,000 that was forfeited by the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- American Surety Co. v. Bethlehem National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- First National Bank of St. Paul v. RamierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Noble Systems Corp. v. Alorica Central, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Cummins Law Office, P.A. v. Norman Graphic Printing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Levaquin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Redd Iron, Inc. v. International Sales & Services Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Kelley v. College of St. BenedictDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.