State Ex Rel. Babbitt v. Arnold
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
In its answer to a request for production of documents, propounded by the real parties in interest, petitioner identified in pertinent part two documents as being relevant to petitioner’s contention that the real parties in interest had conspired to fix the price of burial of deceased Pima County indigents. Petitioner refused to produce the documents, asserting the attorney-client privilege. Thereafter, a motion to compel discovery was filed by the real parties in interest. At the conclusion of the hearing on the motion, the respondent judge upheld petitioner’s claim of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mathews v. PyleArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Giulio Natta, Piero Pino and Georgio Mazzanti, Ex Rel. Interference 89,634 v. Alex Zletz and Standard Oil Company of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- City of Phoenix v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Tucson Medical Center Incorporated v. RowlesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Charles K. Chapman v. Norman Goodman, Special Agent of the Bureau of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces TecumCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Granger v. WisnerArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Christopher Matthew Clements v. Hon. bernini/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2020
- Hammerman v. Northern Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Arizona Department of Economic Security v. O'NeilCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.