Legal Opinion

Arizona Department of Economic Security v. O'Neil

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 11, 1995No. 2 CA-SA 95-0035PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DRUKE, Chief Judge.

In this special action, the Arizona Department of Economic Security (DES) challenges the respondent judge’s order requiring it to disclose to real party in interest Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. (PNI) all information relating to a Pinal County juvenile dependency proceeding, including that which may be protected by the attorney-client privilege. Because DES has no equally plain, speedy, and adequate remedy by appeal, Rules 1 and 3, Ariz. R.P. Spec. Action, 17B A.R.S., we previously accepted jurisdiction and granted relief, with an opinion to follow. This is that opinion.

PN…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mathews v. PyleArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Hanson v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  3. State Ex Rel. Babbitt v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. Gipson v. BeanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Twin City Fire Insurance v. BurkeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State Ex Rel. Thomas v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Twin City v. Hon. Edward burke/general StarArizona Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API