Legal Opinion

Giulio Natta, Piero Pino and Georgio Mazzanti, Ex Rel. Interference 89,634 v. Alex Zletz and Standard Oil Company of Indiana

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 19, 1969No. 17832PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.

This is the fourth appeal in an ancillary action brought by Natta seeking production of documents from Standard Oil Company of Indiana (Standard) to use in patent Interference 89,634. 1

On January 21, 1969, the district court entered an order requiring Standard to produce various documents, except those protected by the attorney-client privilege or constituting attorneys’ work product. In considering that order on Natta’s third appeal, we concluded that Standard had not waived either of those objections to documentary production. Our March 10, 1969, order of affirmance…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
  4. Radiant Burners, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. American Gas Association, Peoples Gas Light and Coke CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  5. Natta v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  2. Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  3. Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
  4. Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
  5. SCM Corp. v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1976

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API