Legal Opinion

Mathews v. Pyle

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1952No. 5600PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHELPS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court dismissing the petition for mandamus filed by William R. Mathews, editor of the Arizona Daily Star, against Honorable Dan E. Garvey as Governor of the state, seeking the right to inspect certain documents in the Governor’s office. With a change in administration the Honorable Howard Pyle, the present Governor, was substituted as party defendant and adopted the answer of his predecessor.

The facts are that Governor Garvey called upon the Attorney General to make an investigation of the affairs of the office of State Land…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Amos v. GunnSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  2. Nowack v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Steel v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. People v. PurcellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Grimm v. Arizona Board of Pardons & ParolesArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State Ex Rel. Newsome v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State ex rel. Dann v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Wiley v. WoodsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. MacEwan v. HOLMOregon Supreme Court · 1961

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API