Legal Opinion

People v. Williams

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 18, 1932No. Docket No. 2208PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

By an information defendant was accused of the crime of forgery. Later, by an amended information, defendant was charged with the commission of the identical offense of which he was originally charged, and in addition thereto, in substance the information contained the allegation that theretofore, in Tuba County, within this state, said defendant had been convicted of the crime of burglary.

Prom a judgment of “conviction of a felony, to wit, forgery, and prior conviction on burglary”, defendant has appealed to this court.

Appellant contends that prejudicial error was committed by the trial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. ChadwickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  2. People v. HettickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Howard v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  4. People v. CarrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Neece v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. TheodoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. People v. SbernoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. People v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. People v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. People v. CrawfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API