People v. Chadwick
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Upon an indictment charging the appellant with the crime of perjury, in having willfully and falsely testified at a trial of himself under the charge of forgery, that two certain telegrams, purporting to have been signed by Marie Schneider which were introduced in evidence at that trial, were written by him on or about the first day of March, 1901, in a cell or room of the police station in the city of Ogden, in the state of Utah, after he had been arrested at…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ball v. RawlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. SimonsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. Lem YouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- People v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- People v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. FolletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- People v. QuickeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. MacKenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.