People v. Hettick

GRAY, C.

—Defendant was convicted of burglary in the first degree, a former conviction of grand larceny was found against him, and he was sentenced to a term' of ten years in the state prison at San Quentin.

When the case was called for trial his attorney suggested a doubt óf the sanity of the defendant and moved the court to submit that question to a jury to be specially impaneled for the purpose under the provisions of sections 3368 and 1369 of the Penal Code. The defendant also offered to present evidence for the purpose of creating a doubt as to defendant’s sanity. The claim of the defense…