Neece v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
PRENDERGAST, Judge.
This appeal is from a conviction of the appellant for violating the prohibition law, secured upon a complaint and information. The penalty assessed was a fine of $100 and sixty days in jail.
1. A motion to quash the complaint and information was made, because the allegations therein attempting to charge a cumulative offense and render defendant liable for cumulative punishment is defective in that the allegation setting up former offenses does not charge facts, but necessarily conclusions, and does not affirmatively allege a charge in the former case, and it fails to show…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Long v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1872
- Kinney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Muckenfuss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Monford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Kinney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hollins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Wall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Ellis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Farris v. TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.