Legal Opinion
Parkinson v. Langdon
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 28, 1918No. Civ. No. 1661PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
It is alleged in the complaint that on May 29, 1915, plaintiff and defendants entered into a contract of lease whereby defendants as tenants of plaintiff agreed among other things to cultivate and farm to beans for the proper cropping season of 1915, and in a good and farmer-like manner certain lands and, among others, a portion described as part of section 8, township 9 north, range 4 east, containing 40 acres, more or less, which was “to be staked out and designated by plaintiff as provided in said contract of lease. ’ ’ That plaintiff, shortly after the execution of said contract, “did…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Teller v. Bay and River Dredging Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Rice v. WhitmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Holt Manufacturing Co. v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Friend & Terry Lumber Co. v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hunt v. United Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Cross v. RamdullahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
- Roach Brothers & Co. v. Lactein Food Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Fallis v. Julian Petroleum Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930