Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Fallis v. Julian Petroleum Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1930No. Docket No. 6272Published

1Concurrence

THOMPSON (IRA. F.), J., Concurring.

I concur in the judgment but deem it proper to set forth my views therefor.

The third cause of action in particular alleges that the leased premises were in proven oil territory; that the drilling of a well to the required depth of 5,200 feet in a workmanlike and careful manner and with due diligence would have resulted in the production of oil and gas in large quantities; that by reason of the negligent failure to drill to the depth mentioned the property was drained of its oil and its gas pressure reduced by wells on adjacent and surrounding property; that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Daughetee v. Ohio Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Blair v. Clear Creek Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  3. Kleppner v. LemonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. Howerton v. Kansas Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. Indianapolis, Bloomington & Western Ry. Co. v. BirneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API