Legal Opinion

Acuna v. Kroack

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 27, 2006No. 2 CA-CV 2005-0049PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 In this personal injury action arising from a motor vehicle accident, defendants/appellants Michael Kroaek and his wife, Sandra Hampton, 1 appeal from the judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff/appellee Marc Acuna. Appellants argue that there was insufficient evidence to support Acuna’s claim of negligent entrustment against Hampton, that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of appellants’ post-accident conduct, and that the jury’s damage award is excessive and not supported by the evidence.

¶ 2 We previously issued an opinion in this…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hawkins v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Standard Chartered PLC v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. Hutcherson v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1998

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Yollin v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. State v. Mabery Ranch, Co., L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Quihuis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Keg Restaurants Arizona, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API