Acuna v. Kroack
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PELANDER, Chief Judge.
¶ 1 In this personal injury action arising from a motor vehicle accident, defendants/appellants Michael Kroaek and his wife, Sandra Hampton, 1 appeal from the judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff/appellee Marc Acuna. Appellants argue that there was insufficient evidence to support Acuna’s claim of negligent entrustment against Hampton, that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of appellants’ post-accident conduct, and that the jury’s damage award is excessive and not supported by the evidence.
¶ 2 We previously issued an opinion in this…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Hawkins v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Standard Chartered PLC v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Hutcherson v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1998
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Yollin v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State v. Mabery Ranch, Co., L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Quihuis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- Keg Restaurants Arizona, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.