Legal Opinion
Doe v. County of Milwaukee
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided January 10, 1995No. Civ. A. 93-C-1097PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
REYNOLDS, District Judge.
Jane Doe (“Doe”) 1 commenced this employment discrimination action against the County of Milwaukee (“County”) on October 8,1993. On the eve of trial, the County filed a motion to amend its answer and for judgment on the pleadings. For the reasons which follow, the court shall grant the County’s motion to amend its answer, and deny the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
I. Summary of the Case
Jane Doe worked as an assistant hospital administrator at Milwaukee County Medical Complex until she was terminated…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Joseph F. Cada v. Baxter Healthcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Burnett v. GrattanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Scot L. Zimmerman v. State of Oregon Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Wayne Soignier v. American Board of Plastic SurgeryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Holmes v. Texas A&M UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Wagner v. TEXAS a & M UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
- Dertz v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.