Legal Opinion
Dertz v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 29, 1995No. 94 C 542PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MANNING, District Judge.
Plaintiffs filed their five-count amended complaint on April 21, 1994 against the City of Chicago (hereafter “City”), Superintendent of Police, Matthew Rodriguez (hereafter “Rodriguez”) and Chief Surgeon, James Bransfield (hereafter “Bransfield”). Counts I and II are brought by plaintiff Lawrence Dertz (hereafter “Dertz”) alleging that the defendants violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (hereafter “ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12131-12134 and the federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794 when they refused to re-employ him after a medical…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Scot L. Zimmerman v. State of Oregon Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Vanover v. HantmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Mark Bledsoe v. Palm Beach County Soil and Water Conservation District, Board of County Commissioners for Palm Beach CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Wagner v. TEXAS a & M UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
- Edward G. Staats v. County of Sawyer and County of BayfieldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.