Burnett v. Grattan
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall
The question presented is whether a state law, establishing a procedure for administrative resolution of employment discrimination complaints, provides an appropriate statute of limitations for actions brought under the Reconstruction-Era Civil Rights Acts, 42 U. S. C. § 1981 et seq. We hold that it does not.
h — I
Respondents James Grattan and Adrienne Hedman were employees of Coppin State College, a predominantly Negro college in Maryland. Their primary responsibility was to recruit students of diverse ethnic backgrounds to attend the school. App. 34-39. Respondents received notice in June…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by433 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hardin v. StraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
428 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.