Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Grattan

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 27, 1984No. 83-264PublishedCited by 433 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall

The question presented is whether a state law, establishing a procedure for administrative resolution of employment discrimination complaints, provides an appropriate statute of limitations for actions brought under the Reconstruction-Era Civil Rights Acts, 42 U. S. C. § 1981 et seq. We hold that it does not.

h — I

Respondents James Grattan and Adrienne Hedman were employees of Coppin State College, a predominantly Negro college in Maryland. Their primary responsibility was to recruit students of diverse ethnic backgrounds to attend the school. App. 34-39. Respondents received notice in June…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by433 opinions

  1. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Hardin v. StraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

428 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API