Legal Opinion
Scot L. Zimmerman v. State of Oregon Department of Justice
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 18, 1999No. 97-36101PublishedCited by 214 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff brought this action claiming, in part, that defendant’s employment practices discriminated against him in violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12131, et seq. The district court dismissed the action, holding that Title II of the ADA does not apply to employment. Addressing this issue of first impression for the Ninth Circuit, we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Because this is an appeal from the dismissal of an action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), we accept as true the facts alleged in the complaint.…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- North Haven Board of Education v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Steckman v. Hart Brewing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by214 opinions
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Kenneth E. Sutton, Jr. v. Providence St. Joseph Medical Center, a California Non-Profit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Valencia-BarraganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
209 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.