Legal Opinion
Noroian v. Department of Administration
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 28, 1970No. Civ. 27069PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOLINARI, P. J.
Respondent agency appeals from a judgment by which the court below issued a peremptory writ of mandate directing respondent to pay petitioner the retirement benefits provided for in Government Code section 21292.8. That section, as a part of the general state disability retirement scheme, provides, in relevant part, that upon retirement for industrial disability of an employee of the Department of Corrections having custodial duties, he shall receive a specified disability retirement allowance. Respondent’s sole contention on appeal is that petitioner’s duties were not…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Crumpler v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Nipper v. California Automobile Assigned Risk PlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Neeley v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Addison v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. ZikorusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.