Legal Opinion

City of Alhambra v. D'Ausilio

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 2011No. B220136PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DOI TODD, Acting P. J.

Appellant Robert D’Ausilio sued respondent City of Alhambra (City) for civil rights violations and then settled the case with the City. The City then sued appellant for breach of the settlement agreement and declaratory relief. Appellant moved to strike the declaratory relief claim under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, the “anti-SLAPP” statute.1 *1304The trial court denied the motion and awarded the City its attorney fees. We agree that appellant failed to demonstrate that the declaratory relief claim arose from activity protected under the statute. We…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Area 51 Prods., Inc. v. City of Alameda, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Mundy v. LencCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Vivian v. LabrucherieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Moriarty v. Laramar Management CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Personal Court Reporters, Inc. v. RandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API