Legal Opinion

Whelan v. Bailey

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 10, 1934No. Civ. 1121PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The county of San Diego adopted a charter in 1932 which was approved by the legislature and went into effect on July 1, 1933. Section 17 of article IV of this charter contains the following: “There is hereby created the office of county counsel. The district attorney shall be ex-officio county counsel.” Section 31 of article VI of the charter, in setting forth the duties of the county counsel, includes the following:

“He shall also act as attorney for the public administrator in the matter of all estates in which such officer is executor, administrator with the will annexed, or administrator,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. Merchants Protective Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. People Ex Rel. Los Angeles Bar Ass'n v. California Protective Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. County of Sacramento v. ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. Reuter v. Bd. of Supervisors of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Weldon v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Dibb v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Brown v. RuffenachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Younger v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API