Legal Opinion

Reuter v. Bd. of Supervisors of San Mateo

California Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1934No. Docket No. S.F. 14969PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The county of San Mateo, acting under the authority of section 7½ of article XI of the Constitution of this state, framed a charter for its own government, which was approved by the legislature at its session in 1933. By this charter the office of county engineer was created: The offices of county surveyor and county engineer were consolidated, and the duties of the consolidated offices were directed to be performed by the incumbent county surveyor, with the proviso “that upon the termination of the present term of office of the surveyor, such office shall, ipso facto, become and be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Merced Security Savings Bank v. CasacciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Gist v. Rackliffe-Gibson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Board of Railroad Commissioners v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Bakkenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Knowles v. YeatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Dibb v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Dempsey v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. City of Grass Valley v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Brown v. RuffenachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Younger v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API