Legal Opinion

Denison State Bank v. Madeira

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 27, 1982No. 53,214PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Holmes, J.:

This appeal involves an action originally filed by The Denison State Bank (the Bank) to recover on three promissory notes executed by the defendant C. C. Madeira and guaranteed by his wife, the defendant Darlene M. Madeira, and a counterclaim filed by the defendants against the Bank alleging breach of a fiduciary duty. In a jury trial the Bank was denied recovery on the promissory notes and the jury returned a verdict for the defendants for $25,000.00 on their counterclaim. The Bank appeals. We reverse. It is necessary that the facts be set…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ford v. Guarantee Abstract & Title Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Wolf v. BrungardtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. DuShane v. Union National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  4. Apperson v. Security State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  5. Lindholm v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Pittsburg, Inc. v. Pepsico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Parker v. Columbia BankCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Idaho First National Bank v. Bliss Valley Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Standard Chartered PLC v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API