Legal Opinion

Supple v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 2, 1988No. B029166PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DANIELSON, J.

Kevin Supple (plaintiff) purports to appeal from a judgment entered on an arbitration award which had become final, and from a previous interlocutory judicial order sustaining a demurrer to two of his five causes of action without leave to amend.

We dismiss the appeal as having been taken from a nonappealable judgment and order.

The Issue

The question presented by this appeal is whether an appeal can be taken from a final arbitration award which has been entered as a judgment so as to permit appellate review of a prior interlocutory judicial order sustaining a demurrer to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Williams v. HorvathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Coulter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Collins v. CorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jennings v. MarralleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Garat v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Rao v. CampoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. American Home Assurance Co. v. BenowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty v. HardinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API