Legal Opinion

Williams v. Horvath

California Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1976No. L.A. 30460PublishedCited by 184 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

Plaintiff minors, by their guardians ad litem, filed an action for damages in the superior court against two named and ten unnamed Los Angeles police officers. The complaint alleged that defendants deprived plaintiffs of civil rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution by “deliberately assaulting and battering plaintiff[s] without just cause or provocation, by imprisoning plaintiffs] without reasonable cause or warrant, and by willfully threatening to shoot and injure plaintiffs].” The action was grounded exclusively on the federal Civil Rights Act. (42 U.S.C. § 1983.)

D…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Testa v. KattSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by184 opinions

  1. State v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. May v. EnomotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Shirk v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Fuchilla v. LaymanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API