Legal Opinion

American Home Assurance Co. v. Benowitz

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 20, 1991No. Docket Nos. B049723, B051996PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, J.

The respondent, Lynn Benowitz, thought that her automobile insurer had unreasonably delayed in acting on her demand to arbitrate a dispute under the uninsured motorist provision of her policy. Through her attorney, she selected her own arbitrator and proceeded to obtain an award at a scheduled hearing. We conclude that the insurer committed no breach giving rise to a waiver of its rights under the uninsured motorist provision of the policy, and that, even if it had, Ms. Beñowitz’s remedy was to compel arbitration. She was not entitled to unilaterally select an arbitrator and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Tammen v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Toal v. TardifCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Hayes Children Leasing Co. v. NCR Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Grubb & Ellis Co. v. BelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Sehulster Tunnels/Pre-Con v. Traylor Brothers, Inc./Obayashi Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Marsch v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API