O'DONNELL v. Pennsylvania R. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
EDELSTEIN, District Judge.
Defendant railroad moves for a new trial in each of two separate causes tried under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. The first cause of action went to the jury on damages only, liability being admitted. Serious back injury was testified to, but the errors alleged relate to two quite minor injuries also claimed, an elbow injury and an injury to the inside of the left cheek. There is no doubt that the evidence on the elbow injury was inconsistent and the medical testimony was weak. But I am convinced that the evidence was sufficient to go to the jury for a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- De Zon v. American President Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Lukon v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Kach v. Monessen Southwestern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Metzger v. Western Maryland Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
- Job v. Erie R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Betesh v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
- Shea v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Rival v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
- Mangrum v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Dunn v. Conemaugh & Black Lick RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.