Job v. Erie R.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
Defendant moves for summary judgment on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any of the material facts which absolve defendant from liability and it is, therefore, entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Plaintiff does not dispute the facts relied on by defendant to relieve it from liability. He denies that these facts justify the legal conclusion which defendant claims they support.
The action is under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, § 1 et seq., 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff.
At the time of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nogueira v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Mostyn v. Delaware, L. & WR Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. BezueSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. O'RourkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Paul Romero Reyes v. Marine Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- O'DONNELL v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- O'ROuRke v. Pennsylvania R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Zientek v. Reading Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.