Legal Opinion

Kach v. Monessen Southwestern Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 23, 1945No. 8946PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARIS, Circuit Judge.

The sole question which this appeal presents is whether the defendant, the Monessen Southwestern Railway Company, is a common carrier by railroad which is engaged in interstate commerce within the meaning of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act,1 the Federal Safety Appliance Acts 2 and the Boiler Inspection Act.3 In the plaintiff’s suit for damages for injuries suffered while employed as a locomotive fireman by the defendant the trial judge held that the defendant was “not a cofnmon carrier of persons or property on a railroad engaged in [interstate] commerce * * * at the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. SettleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. HancockSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. United States v. Colorado & N. W. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  4. Lukon v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  5. McCluskey v. Marysville & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hatfield v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. ArmoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. Holl v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1947
  4. Latsko v. National Carloading Corp. Erie R. Co. v. LatskoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
  5. O'DONNELL v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API