Stich v. Gordon
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, J., pro tem.
The action is in unlawful detainer. Plaintiffs, the landlords, prevailed. The defendants, who appealed, occupied the premises involved, consisting of an apartment house, as assignees of the original tenants. Unless otherwise indicated the word “defendants” will apply to appellants only and the answer referred to will be their answer. The defendants had assumed the lease, which ran for ten years, from July 1, 1926, the rental being $1850 per month, payable on the fifteenth day of each month. The rental falling due on May 15, 1930, and on June 15, 1930, was not paid. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Arnold v. KrigbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Burke v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Telegraph Avenue Corp. v. RaentschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Crittenden v. St. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Wickstrom v. McGrathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Neuhaus v. NorgardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934