Legal Opinion
Neuhaus v. Norgard
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 19, 1934No. Civ. No. 5175PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The plaintiff had judgment against the defendants for the recovery of the sum of $850. From this judgment the defendants appeal.
The record shows that on or about the seventh day of December, 1931, the parties to this action entered into a certain lease whereby the defendants leased to the plaintiff certain garage property situate in the city of Ukiah, for a period of five years at a monthly rental of $225, payable in advance, which was subsequently reduced to $150 per month for a specified time. At the time of the execution of the lease the plaintiff deposited with the defendants the sum of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Treff v. GulkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Phillips-Hollman, Inc. v. Peerless Stages, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Burke v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Wickstrom v. McGrathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Costello v. Martin BrothersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Matter of Escondido West TravelodgeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1985
- Reserve Oil & Gas Co. v. MetzenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Lehr v. CrosbyAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1981
- Burns v. Westamerica Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Daquioag v. EdwardSuperior Court of Guam · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.