Legal Opinion

Baughman v. Pina

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 1, 2005No. 0108-07994, A123696PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

This negligence action arises out of an automobile accident between plaintiff and defendant. The trial court directed a verdict for defendant on the ground that plaintiff did not produce sufficient evidence that defendant’s negligence caused her injuries. We review to determine whether there is expert testimony from which a rational juror could find that there is a reasonable medical probability that defendant’s negligence caused plaintiff’s injuries. See Chouinard v. Health Ventures, 179 Or App 507, 512, 39 P3d 951 (2002) (when causation involves a complex medical question, evidence is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Uris v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Chouinard v. Health VenturesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Joshi v. Providence Health System of Oregon Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Howerton v. PfaffOregon Supreme Court · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McClellan v. I-Flow Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2010
  2. In re Mirena IUD Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. Klimple v. BahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Phelps v. Wyeth, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
  5. Hudjohn v. S&G MACHINERY CO.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API