Klimple v. Bahl

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Gary D. Klimple appealed from a summary judgment dismissing his personal injury action against Mark Bahl. We affirm because Klimple presented insufficient admissible evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact on the issue of whether the motor vehicle accident proximately caused or aggravated Klimple’s Ki-enbock’s disease.

I

[¶ 2] On October 1, 2001, Klimple and Bahl were involved in a motor vehicle acci*258dent in Minot in which Bahl’s vehicle struck Klimple’s vehicle. In April 2004, Klimple sued Bahl, alleging his left wrist and palm were fractured in the accident,…