Beadles v. Fry
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Original action of Mandamus in this court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Burwell, J.:
On January 8th, 1898, H. A. Smith recovered judgment against tbe city of Perry for $20.35. On March 14th, 1898, James Lobsitz also recovered judgment against the same defendant for $504.41. These two judgments were duly assigned to J. B. Beadles, plaintiff in this case. The two judgments with accrued interest (nothing having been paid on either of them), on June 3rd, 1905, (tbe date on which this action wás commenced), amounted to $757.66. On the last named date there were sufficient funds in the citi treasury in the judgment fund, to satisfy both of these…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Angell v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Elliott v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Oklahoma Agricultural & Mechanical College v. WillisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Murphree v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- State ex rel. Courter v. BucklesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Burg v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
- Kerr, County Clerk v. State Ex Rel. WimbishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Ellis v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Board of Councilmen v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- State Ex Rel. State Land Board v. BlakeUtah Supreme Court · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.