Legal Opinion

Beadles v. Fry

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 5, 1905PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Original action of Mandamus in this court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burwell, J.:

On January 8th, 1898, H. A. Smith recovered judgment against tbe city of Perry for $20.35. On March 14th, 1898, James Lobsitz also recovered judgment against the same defendant for $504.41. These two judgments were duly assigned to J. B. Beadles, plaintiff in this case. The two judgments with accrued interest (nothing having been paid on either of them), on June 3rd, 1905, (tbe date on which this action wás commenced), amounted to $757.66. On the last named date there were sufficient funds in the citi treasury in the judgment fund, to satisfy both of these…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Angell v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  2. Elliott v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Oklahoma Agricultural & Mechanical College v. WillisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  4. Murphree v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. State ex rel. Courter v. BucklesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Burg v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Kerr, County Clerk v. State Ex Rel. WimbishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Ellis v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Board of Councilmen v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. State Ex Rel. State Land Board v. BlakeUtah Supreme Court · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API