Ellis v. Armstrong
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
■Error from District Court, Texas County; B. II. Loofbourrow, Judge. Mandamus by O. C. Armstrong and others against O. L. Ellis and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtTubneb, J.
On June 16, 1910, O. C. Armstrong, John Houston, and H. E. Quisenberry, defendants in error, as plaintiffs, filed in the district court for Texas county at G-uymon, upon affidavit, what is indorsed as a “motion for writ of mandamus,” naming O. L. Ellis, W. W. Irvin, and J. N. McEnulty, trustees of the town of Hooker, plaintiffs in error, parties defendant. Therein plaintiffs substantial^ state that defendants are members of the board of trustees of said incorporated town, in said county, and that said Ellis is the president of said board; that plaintiffs are also members of said board,- being…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cameron, Superintendent v. ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
- Matney v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- State ex rel. Attorney-General v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
- Beadles v. FrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- State ex rel. Meckling v. JaynesNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rasure v. SparksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- State Ex Rel. Love v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Elliott v. State Ex Rel. Kirk-PatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Dawson v. DinwiddieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Whitson v. Board of Com'rs, Ellis Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.