Oklahoma Agricultural & Mechanical College v. Willis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Payne Cotmty; before Frank Dale, District Judge. This action was brought by defendants in error, (plaintiffs below,) as partners, against plaintiff in error for a balance alleged to be due them from the said plaintiff in error upon a written contract, for the furnishing of certain material, and the performance of certain' labor in repairing and fitting up some of the rooms in the main college building of defendant below.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by, Keaton, J.:
Several assignments of error are urged by counsel, but, under our,view of this case, it is not only unnecessary, but would be improper, for us to pass upon any of the assignments argued.’ The judgment complained of, omitting certain formal parts, is as follows: “It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the court that the plaintiffs, Charles F. Willis and W. R. Bradford, have and recover of the defendant, the Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical college, the sum of $610.31, and that the same bear interest at the rate of 7 per cent, per annum from this date,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Claiborne County v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- People ex rel. McCauley & Tevis v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Rusch v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
- Dosdall v. County of OlmstedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Eastman v. Clackamas Co.United States Circuit Court · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hjorth Royalty Company v. Trustees of UniversityWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- Moody v. State Prison.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Harrison v. Wyoming Liquor CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
- In re Estate of RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Frank Briscoe Co. v. RUTGERS, STATE UNIVERSITY AND COLLEGE OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.