Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Oliver

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1892PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Union county: James A. Fee, Judge. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.

This is an action of mandamus brought by the plaintiff, as recorder of conveyances for Union county, against the defendant as county clerk of said county, to recover the possession of certain records to which he claims to be entitled by virtue of his office. Upon the petition being filed, an alternative writ was issued, and to this writ the defendant demurred, and the trial court sustained the demurrer and dismissed the action. From this judgment of dismissal the plaintiff appeals, and assigns as error the sustaining of the demurrer. The demurrer to the writ, among other grounds, specifies…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McLeod v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hoover v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. LordOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Lowe v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State Ex Rel. Bethke v. BainOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Briedwell v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Crawford v. School District No. 7Oregon Supreme Court · 1913

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API