Milton v. Hare
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] IN BANC.
Action for damages against defendants who are attorneys. The lower court entered judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendants and dismissed the complaint. The plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
This action was instituted to collect damages from defendants. Defendants are attorneys at law admitted to practice and engaged in the active practice of that profession in this state. Plaintiff had exchanged land situated in the City of Portland for some land in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Scott v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1916
- Ladd & Tilton v. MasonOregon Supreme Court · 1882
- Vooth v. . McEachenNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Poland v. BrownellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Chocktoot v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Niosi v. AielloDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Harding v. BellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Lytle v. Payette-Oregon Slope Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1953
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.