Legal Opinion

Parlier Fruit Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1957No. Civ. 17078PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

In an action for losses under policies of fire insurance, plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant Pacific Indemnity Insurance Company for $43,279.95 with interest from November 29, 1952, against defendant Home Fire and Marine Insurance Company of California for $25,296, together with interest from the same date, and against defendant Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company for $8,467.73 with like interest. All said defendants appeal. In its action for losses under claimed use and occupancy insurance coverages judgment went against plaintiff and in favor of the defendants attempted to be…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Eames v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Howland v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Cottingham v. National Mutual Church InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Dameron v. AnsbroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. Law v. Northern Assurance Co. of LondonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Chicago Title Insurance v. AMZ Insurance Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Zander v. Texaco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Granco Steel, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Covina Union High School District v. JobeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Ahern v. DillenbackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API