Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Calaveras Central Mining Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 21, 1936No. Civ. No. 5421PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The defendant has appealed from a judgment which was rendered against it in a suit based on assigned claims for labor performed for the Victor Land and Mineral Company, the predecessor of the defendant corporation, which claims the appellant promised to pay. Subsequent to the performance of the labor, in part consideration of the defendant’s agreement to pay these labor claims, all of the assets of the Victor Land and Mineral Company were sold and transferred to the defendant.
This is a companion case with the action entitled "Montreeville v. Victor Land & Mineral Go.” (post, p. 753 [57 Pac.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bogart v. George K. Porter Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Zellerbach v. AllenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Furlow Pressed Brick Co. v. Balboa Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Egan v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Daniels v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kraus v. Willow Park Public Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Moss v. Underwriters' Report, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
- R. J. Cardinal Co. v. RitchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Kennerson v. Burbank Amusement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Dick v. WoolsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.