Legal Opinion
Jacques Arley and Charlotte Arley, Husband and Wife v. United Pacific Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 1, 1967No. 20099_1PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KOELSCH, Circuit Judge.
On March 1, 1963, United Pacific Insurance Company issued to Jacques and Charlotte Arley, husband and wife, its standard three year policy of fire insurance covering two buildings located on the Arley’s property in Nevada. The policy had been ordered by one Roger Chaney on January 17, 1963, but at his request was back dated to make coverage commence January 12, 1963.
A dispute over the validity of the policy arose between United and the Arleys because on January 15, three days after the effective date of the policy but two days prior to Chaney’s order, one of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Di Giovanni v. Camden Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- McGrath v. ZanderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. FowlesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Commonwealth v. RutherfoordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
- Townsend v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Alexander Kahan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lewis RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- City of Johnstown, New York v. Bankers Standard Insurance Company, Pacific Employers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Williams v. BowmanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
- Trixler Brokerage Company, a California Corporation v. Ralston Purina Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- League To Save Lake Tahoe, Inc. v. TroundayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.