Taylor v. Margaret R. Pardee Memorial Hospital
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Our review of an Industrial Commission award is limited to two questions: (1) whether there is competent evidence before the Commission to support its findings, and (2) whether the findings support its legal conclusions. Hansel v. Sherman Textiles, 304 N.C. 44, 283 S.E. 2d 101 (1981).
I
Defendants first assign error to the Commission’s finding that a February 1982 CAT scan revealed a five millimeter protrusion at the L5-S1 disc space. This finding is in error. While Dr. McConnachie, plaintiffs expert witness, did testify that the February 1982 CAT scan revealed a five millimeter…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Hall v. Thomason Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Whitley v. Columbia Lumber Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Vaughn v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Harrington v. Pait Logging Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Gilliam v. Perdue FarmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Roset-Eredia v. F.W. Dellinger, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Gibson v. GibsonNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2011
- Hashemi v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.