Legal Opinion

Gilliam v. Perdue Farms

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1993No. 9210IC967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCRODDEN, Judge.

The issue presented by this worker’s compensation case is whether the Industrial Commission erred in concluding that claimant is permanently and totally disabled, entitling claimant to compensation under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-29 (1991).

Our review of an Industrial Commission’s award is limited to two questions: (1) whether there was competent evidence before the Commission to support its findings of fact, and (2) whether the findings support the legal conclusions. Hansel v. Sherman Textiles, 304 N.C. 44, 49, 283 S.E.2d 101, 104 (1981). The findings of the Industrial Commission…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Taylor v. Margaret R. Pardee Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goff v. Foster Forbes Glass DivisionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Sanders v. Broyhill Furniture IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Silver v. Roberts Welding ContractorsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API