Harrington v. Pait Logging Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
By his only assignment of error plaintiff argues that he is entitled to compensation for permanent total disability pursuant to G.S. 97-29.
The deputy commissioner made no findings or conclusions with respect to permanent total disability. However he did note, relying on Perry v. Hibriten Furniture Co., 296 N.C. 88, 249 S.E. 2d 397 (1978), that:
If by reason of any compensable injury an employee is unable to work and earn any wages he is totally disabled and entitled to compensation for permanent total disability under 97-29 unless all his injuries are included in the schedule set…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Whitley v. Columbia Lumber Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Perry v. Hibriten Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Carpenter v. HawleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Harrell v. JP Stevens & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Taylor v. Margaret R. Pardee Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Effingham v. THE KROGER CO.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Vandiford v. Stewart Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Lanning v. Fieldcrest-Cannon, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Effingham v. THE KROGER CO.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Vandiford v. Stewart Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990