Legal Opinion

Roset-Eredia v. F.W. Dellinger, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 2008No. COA07-644PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

When plaintiff presented sufficient evidence of total disability and defendant-employer failed to rebut plaintiff’s evidence, the Industrial Commission did not err in concluding that plaintiff is temporarily totally disabled.

I. Factual Background and Procedural History

Jonathan Roset-Eredia, a/k/a Liborio Valdavinos-Barriga (plaintiff), was 35 years of age at the time of the hearing before the deputy commissioner, and was an undocumented worker from Mexico. He can read and write in Spanish, but is functionally illiterate in English. On 27 July 2001, plaintiff broke his right…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Russell v. Lowes Product DistributionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Holley v. Acts, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  5. McRae v. Toastmaster, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lynaugh v. Cvs PharmacyNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2011
  2. Reaves v. INDUSTRIAL PUMP SERVICECourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. Rosenberger v. City of RaleighNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API