Duckworth v. Watsonville Water & Light Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is the third appeal in this cause. Upon the first appeal the judgment below in favor of the plaintiff was reversed. (Duckworth, v. Watsonville etc. Co., 150 Cal. 520, [89 Pac. 338].) Upon the second appeal from a similar judgment at the second trial, the judgment was again reversed. (Duckworth v. Watsonville etc. Co., 158 Cal. 206, [110 Pac. 927].) The plaintiff again recovered judgment in the court below and the defendant again appeals. S. J. Duckworth is now the sole plaintiff, he having succeeded to the interests of Flora McKinlay Duckworth, originally a co-plaintiff with him.
The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Alta Land & Water Co. v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Duckworth v. Watsonville Water & Light Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- De Necochea v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Herminghaus v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Union Transportation Co. v. Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Lavely v. NonemakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Haight v. CostanichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.