Heilbron v. Last Chance Water Ditch Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County, and from an order refusing a new trial The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
McFarland J.
This is an action to restrain defendant (a corporation) from diverting water from a natural watercourse called Kings River, and for damages for past diversion. The court below, sitting without a jury, gave judgment for defendant; and from the judgment, and an order denying a new trial, the plaintiffs appeal.
The plaintiffs, who are August Heilbron, Adolph Heilbron, S. Clayburgh, and S. C. Lillis, aver in their complaint that they “ are now, and they and their predecessors and grantors for more than five years last past have been, the owners and in lawful possession of” a large…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by21 opinions
- Herminghaus v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Miller & Lux Inc. v. Enter. Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Oneto v. RestanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Turner v. the James Canal Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Coonradt v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.