Dorsey v. Barry.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the County Court, Tuolumne County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Coxu-t.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Rhodes, J.
Dorsey and Barry, and two other persons, were candidates at the general election of 1863 for the office of constable for Township No. 1, in Tuolumne County. The Board of Supervisors canvassed the election, and declared Barry and John Edwards duly elected as constables for said township. On the 23d day of October, 1863, Dorsey filed in the County Court of Tuolumne County his petition, contesting the election of Barry, and praying that he (Dorsey) might be declared elected in the place of Barry. A citation was issued to Barry to appear before the Court on the 2d day of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Livingston v. MayorCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1831
- Koppikus v. State Capitol Comm'rsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- People ex rel. Whitney v. Board of Delegates of San Francisco Fire DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Searcy v. GrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- People ex rel. Bailey v. Supervisors of GreeneNew York Supreme Court · 1851
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Diamond v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. Bank of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Schwarz v. County CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Town of Sugar v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.