Legal Opinion
Kimball v. New Hampshire Board of Accountancy
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided September 18, 1978No. 78-085PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The question in this case is whether the New Hampshire Board of Accountancy exceeded its statutory authority when it promulgated a regulation requiring “[a] 11 partners of partnerships practicing public accounting in the State of New Hampshire [to] either be ‘certified public accountants’ or ‘public accountants’ licensed in some state or other jurisdiction.”
According to an agreed statement of facts, N. F. Bigelow & Company was formed in 1972 and is a firm doing business as a partnership. As the only firm in the State that practices accountancy and that consists of partners who are accountants…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Ferretti v. JacksonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
- State v. NormandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1913
- Rosenblum v. Judson Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1954
- Blue Mountain Forest Ass'n v. Town of CroydonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Appeal of PlantierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Appeal of Concord Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- In Re Alexis O.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- Smith Insurance v. Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.