Appeal of Concord Natural Gas Corp.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The plaintiff gas utility companies challenge the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission’s (PUC) promulgation of rules precluding electric and gas utilities from including the cost of certain political, promotional, and institutional advertising and activities in operating expenses. We uphold the rules.
In June 1978, as part of an effort to formulate a national energy policy, Congress enacted the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, PUB. L. No. 95-617, 92 Stat. 3117 (1978) (hereinafter “PURPA”). Title I of the act established retail regulatory policies for electric utilities;…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Silva v. BotschSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Legislative Utility Consumers' Council v. Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Murach v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Appeal of Concerned Corporators of the Portsmouth Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- In re DonovanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Chasan v. Village District of EastmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- In re BazemoreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.